01
Explain the relationship instead of promising universal connection
A project introduction should identify what is being linked. Notes may refer to other notes, systems may send records and lessons may connect concepts through prerequisites. These relationships have different meanings and should not share a vague claim that everything works together. For Silinq, the supporting sentence can name the objects and the action between them. A reader should be able to point to one example and explain it in ordinary language. That is a stronger basis for understanding the project than relying on a decorative chain or a dense diagram with no labels.
02
Keep direction visible wherever it matters
Some connections are naturally treated as mutual; others are explicitly one-way. A future Silinq interface should state which kind it represents rather than leaving the viewer to infer direction from layout. For a directed relationship, an arrowhead and a short label can carry information that a plain line cannot. The same convention should appear in the interface, exported diagrams and help examples. If a relationship can be followed in both directions, document that explicitly. The identity then supports a consistent visual language without making the project’s actual rules dependent on its name.
03
Use consistent spelling and stable identifiers
Silinq ends with q, so keep that spelling visible in headings and filenames intended for people to recognise. If a pronunciation is selected, present it as the project’s preferred reading rather than a claimed historical origin. Within the product, stable identifiers can keep links attached to the right object when a title changes. A note called Draft today may have a different title tomorrow. Separating its identity from its display label prevents a naming change from being confused with a new object, and gives documentation a durable way to refer to examples.